Apartment Sterna

Let me start with the fact that the photos posted on booking are not up to date. I would say they are from 3 or even 5 years ago. Photos are taken in a skilful way so that the shortcomings of the premises are not visible. I write premises, because the name of the apartment in this case is greatly exaggerated. The mass of defects of the premises itself in the form of numerous construction deficiencies makes the stay a necessary evil. The owner and the rental agency, to our comments about the place, thought that everything was fine, and if we didn't like it, we could go elsewhere without a refund. Responsibility bland, agency for the owner, the owner for agencies and at the very end it was stated that we can advertise the stay on booking. Being 1000 km from home with two children we had to stay in the apartment. All the things listed in the booking offer were there, but most of them could be faulted. Write something wrong. And finally, the neighborhood, or rather the nearest neighbourhood: here the neighborhood was deliberately not shown on the booking and we were deliberately misled. If we had seen what the buildings on the left and right look like, we would definitely not have decided on this pseudo apartment. The owner of the premises is surly, with no respect for women, who believes that "a woman has no right to point out to him that something is wrong, because it is his "home". Notes on rooms and attached photos: 1. Rooms: Lots of cobwebs, cracks and dirt on the walls. 2. Hall, stairs: compaction, dirt, peeling paint. 3. Bathrooms: a broken fan, a broken towel rack, construction imperfections (a hole around the door, tiles at the shower faucets not cut properly), stains on the soap dishes. 4. Surroundings: drama in a word. The price for the premises in Sterno is 50% overpriced.